Re: Maintainership dates

Hi! > In my opinion, these should be treated basically like unmaintained > extensions, i.e. issue a call for maintainership. It seems to be > appropriate to explicitly CC the listed maintainers, though. > > However, I would prefer to issue the calls for maintainership one by > one, or more likely in small chunks, to avoid excessive flooding of the > mailing list. It also might be sensible to wait until 7.3 feature > freeze, or at least until the traffic on internals@ abates. Sounds good. Anybody wants to help with writing the text for the call (it should include some explanations about what it is about and what the person is to do) and on which venues it should be announced? -- Stas Malyshev smalyshev@gmail.com