Re: Class name resolution for \array::class

Since array is not a class, it doesn't make sense to resolve its type. What's the use-case for such pseudo-constant in your code? Marco Pivetta http://twitter.com/Ocramius http://ocramius.github.com/ On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 1:30 AM Marcos Passos <marcospassos.com@gmail.com> wrote: > Currently, class name resolution supports all types except an array. > https://3v4l.org/OXFMW > > In fact, it is syntactically invalid since the parser fails to recognize > array::class as an array expression: > > Parse error: syntax error, unexpected 'array' (T_ARRAY), expecting > > identifier (T_STRING) > > https://3v4l.org/5IOoI > > > Is possible to change the grammar to support array also? > > - Marcos >