Re: What to do with ext/xmlrpc?
| From: | Remi Collet | Date: | Thu, 10 Jan 2019 11:00:08 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: What to do with ext/xmlrpc? | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-103710@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Le 09/01/2019 à 13:28, Christoph M. Becker a écrit :
> Hi!
>
> The problem with ext/xmlrpc is that it relies on libxmlrpc-epi[1], which
> looks abandoned. Even worse, we're bundling a modified 0.51[2], while
As for mcrypt, I think we should move it to PECL
to clearly state, this should be avoid.
ext/imap should follow the same road.
BTW, if we want to keep this extension, we need to consider the bundled
library as a fork, maintained by US (and drop support to build using the
system library, if present)
So, any new volunteer to maintain this extension, will also have to
maintain the library.
Remi
Attachment: [application/pgp-signature] OpenPGP digital signature signature.asc
Attachment: [application/pgp-signature] OpenPGP digital signature signature.asc