Re: Simplify license headers
| From: | Legale Legage | Date: | Mon, 28 Jan 2019 17:58:53 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Simplify license headers | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-103869@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Intellectual rights include:
non-property rights (right to authorship, right to author's name, etc.);
property rights (exclusive rights or copyright);
A very interesting question appears:
Who own the copyright for the PHP source code?
Is Nikita right when he says that the copyright on PHP belongs to all
the co-authors who contributed to the development?
Best regards,
Ruslan
On 28/01/2019, Zeev Suraski <zeev@zend.com> wrote:
>
>> I would like to make two changes to this header:
>>
>> 1. Change "PHP Version 7" line to just "PHP", to avoid the necessity of
>> updating this for
>> new major versions. I don't think the version information here is
>> particularly useful to
>> anybody.
>
> I don't mind that much, but I don't see any issue with keeping it the way it
> is either. It does look nicer the way it is now IMHO, and the cost
> associated with changing it twice a decade is, well, not very substantial.
>
>> 2. Remove the "Copyright (c) 1997-2018 The PHP Group" line. Apart from
>> requiring a
>> yearly update, this line is actually complete misinformation, because the
>> PHP group
>> does *not* hold the copyright for the PHP source code. This would require
>> a copyright
>> assignment agreement on behalf of all contributors, which we do not
>> collect.
>>
>> We could also just drop the header entirely, I'm just proposing these two
>> changes as
>> the path of least resistance towards getting the "annoying" parts
>> removed.
>
> I'm no lawyer, but I do believe a case can be made for claiming that a
> person putting code into files with the header 'Copyright (c) XYZ', is in
> fact implicitly assigning copyright to XYZ. So while it's not as strong as
> an explicit copyright assignment, and while it was never tested in court
> (and hopefully never will be) - I do see value in keeping it. I certainly
> don't see a reason to change it after 20 years where it didn't seem to
> bother anybody, unless there's a strong reason to do that, which currently I
> don't see.
>
> Zeev
>