Re: RFC Draft: Comprehensions

Hi Den tir. 12. mar. 2019 kl. 18.36 skrev Chase Peeler <chasepeeler@gmail.com>: > I've never liked "developers might use it wrong" as reason to not implement > something, especially if hard to read/complex code is the worst impact to improper use. Me neither to be fair, but I think it is a fair consideration to have when designing syntax. I agree with Stas reply in this thread regarding this. > I understand that you are talking about the syntax (which others have said is still up for > discussion) and not the feature itself. I still wanted to make the comment above more a general > response to that line of thinking. I like the feature as it is, and if the syntax is right for it then I would most likely vote for it if it comes to that state. -- regards, Kalle Sommer Nielsen kalle@php.net