Re: Question about adding !function_identifier

Hello, yes this is very true, but still foreign to the language construct; empty contextual indicators it's what we usually do in C and assembly (it has no cost) especially on extra sensitive code to make it short. On Wed, Apr 3, 2019 at 10:00 AM Claude Pache <claude.pache@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Le 3 avr. 2019 à 18:52, M. W. Moe <mo.mu.wss@gmail.com> a écrit : > > > > Hello, > > > > not documenting at first is not really a question of laziness or so, as > > things are still moving around > > you absolutely need this agility; a good design layout between theory > and > > stable state will refactored > > discussed a thousand times; that what I expect from engineers; filling > the > > gaps between assumptions > > and reality. > > > > And for me-self throw vs no throw is important language information and > > part of internal behaviors; > > to clarify, for instance, would be more useful to have such indicator > > rather than having having > > abstract and interface which are cumbersome; same as the extra public > > keyword; you can do without > > especially with the new traits construct. > > > > Best. > > If you’re unwilling to write a docblock for some good reason, why not just > use the built-in, user-extensible way that most programming languages have > to add annotations without runtime effect, namely unstructured comments? > Something like /* nothrow */ is both forward- and backward-compatible... Am > I missing something? > > —Claude > >