Re: The open letter to Derick Rethans <derick@php.net>
| From: | Antony Dovgal | Date: | Wed, 16 Jun 2004 08:20:27 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: The open letter to Derick Rethans <derick@php.net> | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-10506@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Wed, 16 Jun 2004 10:55:56 +0300
"Alexander Valyalkin" <valyala@tut.by> wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Jun 2004 22:48:35 +0200, Bert Slagter <bert@procurios.nl>
> wrote:
>
> As you could notice, I provide majority of my patches with standalone
> test applications, which could be used to track possible bugs in my
> code and to compare the performance, stability, advantages and
> clearity to old code.
Please, point to me these tests.
http://lists.php.net/article.php?group=php.internals&article=10467
http://lists.php.net/article.php?group=php.internals&article=10461
http://lists.php.net/article.php?group=php.internals&article=10435
http://lists.php.net/article.php?group=php.internals&article=10409
I can't find any tests in your letters, that can prove, that your
patches work at all platforms and do not break existing functionality.
And even more. You didn't prove, that with your patches it will work
faster, as you claim - there is also no benchmarks.
> So, I can done the conclusion, that PHP developers are not
> interested in performance and stability improving at all. It seems,
> that all of them are occupied by "fixing" bugs reported by users
> at bugs.php.net (are you consider that any PHP user is your
> "beta-tester"?), but do not audit any existing code
> for memory leaks, memory access violation and nessessary error checks.
Oh, yeah, of course.
---
WBR,
Antony Dovgal aka tony2001
tony2001@phpclub.net || antony@dovgal.com