Re: [RFC] Strict operators directive

From: Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2019 09:22:05 +0000
Subject: Re: [RFC] Strict operators directive
References: 1 2 3 4  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-106068@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Am 26.06.2019 um 11:09 schrieb Benjamin Morel <benjamin.morel@gmail.com>: > >> "120" > "99.9"; // TypeError >> Anything else will bring confusion. > > Not sure about this, you can do it the JS way: if both operands are > strings, then it behaves like strcmp(): > > "23" > "4"; // false > "23" > "221"; // true > > I'm not saying that we should do it, but this would not be confusing to me > at all. With the proposed change both "23" > "4" === true # Current behaviour and "23" > "4" === false # New strict behaviour could be the case depending on a declaration somewhere else in the source code. That's the confusion Claude and I were talking about: You cannot be sure what a very simple line of code does. - Chris

« previous php.internals (#106068) next »