Re: question on policy of renaming an extension
| From: | Jan Lehnardt | Date: | Sun, 20 Jun 2004 18:05:39 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: question on policy of renaming an extension | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-10658@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On 20 Jun 2004, at 19:42, Brad House wrote:
When PECL is better adopted by the community, and PHP provides documentation on them, I would have no problem moving it there.Following Rasmus' mail, moving your extension also increases the convenience for you the developer and the users. As a developer you're no longer tied to PHP's release schedule, but you are free to release a new version whenever you want. For the users of your extension it means, they can have an updated version (be it a bug- or security-fix) anytime you release it and not only when a PHP version comes out. Installing a PECL based extension is as easy as $ pear install foobar See http://pecl.php.net/ for more information. Jan - -- GPG Key: BB96 56B0 Q: Thank Jan? - A: http://geschenke.an.dasmoped.net/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (Darwin) iD8DBQFA1dH07KW8t7uWVrARAgl6AKCYOnflBFVhdoBWtLMOryG7KGskAwCfRhK5 xSnFluy8FsfkWMSrgw9jqOw= =lJp+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----