Re: Deprecate PHP's short open tags, again
| From: | Robert Korulczyk | Date: | Wed, 14 Aug 2019 09:51:11 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Deprecate PHP's short open tags, again | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-106588@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
W dniu 14.08.2019 o 11:09, Christian Schneider pisze:
> Am 14.08.2019 um 10:39 schrieb Peter Kokot <peterkokot@gmail.com>:
>>> The best counterargument I can give against "cleaning up" is that it takes
>>> energy away from actual new features, even if it's just the mental energy of monitoring and
>>> responding to long threads like this one.
>>
>> Code is like a garden. If there are unwanted weeds and nobody cleans
>> them up, the flowers don't shine and grow as they should. Cleaning of
>> the weeds is just as important as new features. A bit less but
>> important.
>
> Going with your analogy: Some things (like short open tags) are that individual small flower in
> the corner of the garden which does not multiply. We already spent way too much time discussing it,
> the rest of the garden needs water and the gardeners are fighting over a dandelion. A bike-shed
> discussion at its worst: No real gain but everybody has an opinion.
> Real cleaning up, now that's where it gets interesting. And those discussions tend to be
> more productive even recently.
>
> Oh and: I'm very much afraid the OP was trolling and succeeded in getting people to react,
> so please, please let this particular thread die :-(
>
> - Chris
>
>
It is surprising how thing that is considered by one to be a security risk, is treated as nothing
relevant by others. This dichotomy is quite
disturbing - in what case removing security risk is "no real gain"?