Re: Changing fundamental language behaviors
| From: | Christian Schneider | Date: | Fri, 13 Sep 2019 08:10:24 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Changing fundamental language behaviors | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-107051@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Am 13.09.2019 um 09:41 schrieb Lester Caine <lester@lsces.uk>:
> On 12/09/2019 23:16, Mike Schinkel wrote:
>> Those who vote on this list will decide if breaking WordPress end-user's site bothers
>> them or not.
That's something too few people on this list seem to be aware of:
Breaking other people's perfectly functional code because you believe in a different coding
style is not something which should be done easily.
> So we *DO* need an LTS version of PHP that will run perfectly functional websites for the next
> ten years while others create the next replacement for the likes of WordPress by moving framework
> functionality inside PHP ...
I agree!
Which means there will be additional burden on the PHP core developers as there will be another
version to back port security fixes to for a long time. Also not a decision to be made lightly.
While I do like democracy I also agree with Zeev that it is too easy for people to vote yes on a
breaking change even if they didn't think it through.
So if you voted yes for any change of a notice/warning to an exception (which will break things)
please reconsider!
Is it really worth it? And if you really think so, could we make it opt-in? Or at least globally
opt-out-able?
- Chris