Re: Constraints and userland@

On 10/9/19 11:16 PM, Mike Schinkel wrote: > As a straw man proposal there could be a set number of seats (~250?), divided up by how they > are involved in PHP; corp developer, independent developer, framework vendor, hosting company, etc. > They should participate as representatives of userland rather than as representatives of their own > opinions. They would get to vote on things so we could gauge userland's interests, but their > vote could only be used to veto an accepted RFC, and internals@ could override the veto if, say, 90% > of internals@ members voted to do so. As a part of PHP community I like the idea. I'd propose something that could make the proposal simpler in implementation. Create a poll system where users are authorized to be registered and be able to vote if they are github/gitlab users with >1000 commits in projects where PHP is one of the main languages. I think something like that should be doable and will not require any "paper work". It should give quite good estimation on the community preferences (even if it would exclude non-open source entities). I very much like the idea such vote would be a veto which would rise the bar for an RFC to pass. ps. first time poster, but I couldn't sit quiet seeing what's going on on the list recently. -- Aleksander 'A.L.E.C' Machniak Kolab Groupware Developer [http://kolab.org] Roundcube Webmail Developer [http://roundcube.net] ---------------------------------------------------- PGP: 19359DC1 # Blog: https://kolabian.wordpress.com