Re: Re: Fix for bug #28325

From: Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 16:48:39 +0000
Subject: Re: Re: Fix for bug #28325
References: 1 2 3  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-10860@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Yeah it might make sense to think of something like that. What does serializing a SimpleXML object do today? Andi At 09:29 AM 7/1/2004 -0700, Sterling Hughes wrote:
this would still not suffice for a proper serialization, overloaded objects should have serialize and unserialize handlers.... something for 5.1 methinks. -sterling On Thu, 1 Jul 2004 16:03:09 +0900, Moriyoshi Koizumi <moriyoshi@at.wakwak.com> wrote: On 2004/07/01, at 14:25, Andi Gutmans wrote:
Hi Moriyoshi, The object handle is not a unique identifier. Different object types (e.g. PHP objects, SimpleXML objects) can have the same object handle. The real unique identifier is object handle + object handlers array or more useful in your case, possibly class name and object handle.
Thanks for the advice. So, will object handle + the VM address to the class entry suffice either? Moriyoshi -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php


« previous php.internals (#10860) next »