Re: [RFC] [DISCUSSION] str_contains
| From: | Ben Ramsey | Date: | Mon, 24 Feb 2020 16:56:48 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [RFC] [DISCUSSION] str_contains | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-108740@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
> On Feb 24, 2020, at 10:52, Philipp Tanlak <philipp.tanlak@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Ben Ramsey <ben@benramsey.com> schrieb am Mo. 24. Feb. 2020 um 17:21:
>> > On Feb 23, 2020, at 03:12, Philipp Tanlak <philipp.tanlak@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hey PHP Devs!
>> >
>> > Since the RFC to str_contains is now almost a week old and most of the
>> > discussion happened in the initial discussion/proposal thread, I wasn't
>> > sure if everyone has seen it. Therefore I'd like to create this new email
>> > thread with the correct label for RFC discussions, before we open up the
>> > RFC for voting in approximately a week from now.
>> >
>> > If there is any feedback or something you'd like to discuss, feel free to
>> > leave it here.
>> >
>> > Link to RFC: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/str_contains
>> >
>> > Regards
>> > Philipp
>>
>>
>> Just so I’m clear on the functionality here, is this essentially the same behavior as the
>> following?
>>
>>
>> strpos($haystack, $needle) !== false
>>
>>
>> And the purpose is primarily for a better developer experience by reducing confusion
>> through providing a dedicated function for this behavior?
>
> Yes, this is correct.
As an effort to improve developer experience, I’m on board with this. I think it make sense to add
this.
Cheers,
Ben
Attachment: [application/pgp-signature] Message signed with OpenPGP signature.asc
Attachment: [application/pgp-signature] Message signed with OpenPGP signature.asc