Re: RFC: Interest in function autoloading?

> I've searched the archive, but I haven't found anything about this issue.  > I notice there exists an RFC for autoloading of functions, or more to the > point, a unified autoloading system for classes, functions, constants and > streams: Hi Terje, I'd brought this up 2 months ago in https://externals.io/message/107967 "Autoloading functions/consts without a performance impact" One major issue is that foo() can refer to both foo() and NS\foo() from namespace NS, and there's many different opinions on how/if an autoloader should deal with that, each with their own drawbacks. If the ambiguity was avoided, then I think more people would be open to autoloading for functions/constants. I had proposed one option for avoiding ambiguity for functions and constants, which was rejected: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/use_global_elements I don't think the proposed alternatives would reach a 2/3 majority either if voted on, though, but may be mistaken. - Tyson