Re: [RFC][DISCUSSION] throw expression

Hi Dan Interesting suggestion. I'll have to think more about how many of these variations there are and if there's an easy way to recognize them. Ilija On 22.03.20, 18:16, "Dan Ackroyd" <Danack@basereality.com> wrote: On Sun, 22 Mar 2020 at 16:17, Ilija Tovilo <ilija.tovilo@me.com> wrote: > > Due to the modest feedback I’d like to move the throw expression RFC to “under > discussion”. > > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/throw_expression > Regarding the example: $condition || throw new Exception('$condition must be truthy') && $condition2 || throw new Exception('$condition2 must be truthy'); The "Deprecate left-associative ternary operator"* RFC made it so that parentheses are required when ternary operators are nested in complicated statements. Would a similar requirement for parentheses around complicated throw expressions be a suitable solution to avoid people being surprised by the behaviour? cheers Dan Ack * https://wiki.php.net/rfc/ternary_associativity