Re: [RFC] [EPILOGUE] Server-Side Request and Response Objects (v2)

Le mercredi 8 avril 2020, 07:35:10 CEST Paul M. Jones a écrit : > ## Lessons Learned > > ### Userland Functionality > > The initial impression is that there is a strong desire for work that *can* be done in userland > to *stay* in userland. However, that impression conflicts with the recent acceptance of > str_contains(), which is very easily done in userland. > > **Lesson:** Of functionality that can be accomplished in userland, only trivial/simple > functionality is acceptable. My take on that is more that functionality in core needs to be «perfect», or at least near unanimous. And of course it’s way easier to find a solution which pleases everyone when it’s for something quite simple. I do think OO interface for request/response in core is something that could pass, but it would need to be more in line with what people want/expect. > ### Userland Ecosystem > > There was somewhat less concern for "the ecosystem," but it too was prevalent in the > discussion. > > **Lesson:** Perceived challenges to popular userland projects are going to be met with strong > resistance by their existing stakeholders, even when an RFC is explicitly not a challenge to them. You clearly disagree on this with most participants in the discussion, but saying «this RFC is not a challenge» is not enough to make it true, there was a clear overlap of feature between your RFC and existing userland projects so it made sense to compare them. -- Côme Chilliet FusionDirectory - https://www.fusiondirectory.org