Re: [RFC] PHP Namespace Policy
| From: | Mark Randall | Date: | Wed, 15 Apr 2020 12:17:09 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [RFC] PHP Namespace Policy | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-109650@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On 15/04/2020 12:40, Dan Ackroyd wrote:
Another benefit of having core PHP symbols in the root namespace is that it means we can avoid having the discussion of what the namespace naming rules should be. Again, the tradeoff of having to spend time on that discussion of how to name things vs a possible small benefit of having new symbols under a namespace, seems a bad tradeoff.Dan, I see this being as simple as the RFC author stating that they intend to use a specific namespace such as: \PHP\Tokenizer Followed by updating a wiki page once it's been approved to list the namespace and the RFC which approved it. In that respect it would be no different than arguing over any other name which can already happen. Mark Randall marandall@php.net