Re: Draft RFC: foreach iteration of keys without values
| From: | Thomas Bley | Date: | Wed, 02 Sep 2020 14:31:23 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Draft RFC: foreach iteration of keys without values | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-111783@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Hello,
I'd also like to propose to use null:
[null, null, $username] = getUserData();
foreach ($source as $key => null) {}
Regards
Thomas
> David Rodrigues <david.proweb@gmail.com> hat am 02.09.2020 16:24 geschrieben:
>
>
> I think "void" is a good solution and is very clear, compared to "_".
>
> [void, void, $username] = getUserData();
>
>
> Atenciosamente,
> David Rodrigues
>
>
> Em qua., 2 de set. de 2020 às 10:57, Dik Takken <dik.takken@gmail.com>
> escreveu:
>
> > On 02-09-2020 15:35, Chase Peeler wrote:
> > > Isn't the underscore an alias for gettext()?
> >
> > You are right, it is. Now this does not necessarily mean that underscore
> > cannot be used for ignored variables. Depending on the context in which
> > it is used an underscore may or may not be ambiguous.
> >
> > Since we are talking about using underscore in places where a variable
> > name is expected, there may not be any problem at all. But we should be
> > aware of all cases in which ambiguous syntax could emerge and identify
> > any issues. So thanks a lot for pointing out this possible trouble maker!
> >
> > Regards,
> > Dik Takken
> >
> > --
> > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> > To unsubscribe, visit: https://www.php.net/unsub.php
> >
> >