Re: Attributes and constructor property promotion

On Tue, 6 Oct 2020 at 17:20, Andreas Leathley <a.leathley@gmx.net> wrote: > From my understanding suppressing the validation errors in this > particular case would be a good solution, or are there any serious > downsides to that? > The downside presumably is that a library author could implement an attribute with a property-only restriction, and therefore write code handling parameter attributes with the assumption that that attribute won't be present. If a consumer of the library makes use of constructor property promotion, that assumption can be violated. I can't quite picture what that code would look like, though, since it's always necessary to filter the list of attributes to exclude those from other libraries. Regards, -- Rowan Tommins [IMSoP]