Re: PHP releases, OPcache + Jit bugs, and communication

From: Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2020 21:32:24 +0000
Subject: Re: PHP releases, OPcache + Jit bugs, and communication
References: 1  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-112283@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Hey Dan, <http://ocramius.github.com/> On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 9:48 PM Dan Ackroyd <Danack@basereality.com> wrote: > Hi internals, > > Currently the PHP project doesn't have a particularly great way of > letting users know when serious defects have been found in versions of > PHP. > > My understanding is that this has been an issue before, when defects > were found in OPcache. Due to OPcache incorrectly optimizing code, > bugs could spontaneously appear anywhere in users code. As we had > nothing in place, we didn't have a way of communicating 'the latest > version is borked, avoid it' Fortunately there were few incidents of > this. > > However, the JIT is quite likely to have many similar issues, where > either new issues, or regressions, could seriously affect the > integrity of how data is processed in PHP applications. > > I'd like to suggest that this could be improved by having some machine > readable data somewhere (see example below), that contains a list of > known critical issues that people should know about before upgrading > to a particular version of PHP. > > This would at least allow people to either hold off on upgrading from > a version that works, to a known bad version, as well as do things > like alert their ops team of investigating whether a newly found issue > could be affecting their programs, and it might be appropriate for > them to revert to a previous version of PHP. > > Thoughts? And does anyone know of any projects that already do this, > so we can be inspired by their best practices? > > cheers > Dan > Ack > > btw before anyone suggests "why don't we just have more releases?", > PHP is mostly distributed through package managers on a fixed > schedule. Switching to an ad-hoc schedule would be a huge amount of > work for many people, and doesn't like a reasonable thing to do. > > > Example of data > --------------------- > [ > { > "version": "8.0.1", > "issues": [ > { > "link": > "https:\/\/bugs.php.net\/bug.php?id=12345", > "affects": "jit" > } > ] > }, > { > "version": "8.0.0", > "issues": [ > { > "link": > "https:\/\/bugs.php.net\/bug.php?id=12345", > "affects": "opcache" > } > ] > } > ] > > The 'affects' entry could be a comma separated list of things such as: > > jit - the JIT > opcache - opcache > php - the core engine with/without JIT or OPcache. > security - known security flaws that of a severity that justify an > urgent upgrade > An rss/atom feed with affected version ranges (can be added via XSD, I suppose) would be fantastic: I'd factor it into roave/security-advisories ASAP, if there was a way to have such a thing :-) Marco Pivetta http://twitter.com/Ocramius http://ocramius.github.com/

« previous php.internals (#112283) next »