Re: [RFC] Enumerations
| From: | Paul Crovella | Date: | Sat, 05 Dec 2020 01:37:37 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [RFC] Enumerations | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-112418@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 3:25 PM Larry Garfield <larry@garfieldtech.com> wrote:
>
> Greetings, denizens of Internals!
>
> Ilija Tovilo and I have been working for the last few months on adding support for enumerations
> and algebraic data types to PHP. This is a not-small task, so we've broken it up into several
> stages. The first stage, unit enumerations, are just about ready for public review and discussion.
>
> The overarching plan (for context, NOT the thing to comment on right now) is here:
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/adts
>
> The first step, for unit enumerations, is here:
>
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/enumerations
>
> There's still a few bits we're sorting out and the implementation is mostly done, but
> not 100% complete. Still, it's far enough along to start a discussion on and get broader
> feedback on the outstanding nits.
>
> I should note that while the design has been collaborative, credit for the implementation goes
> entirely to Ilija. Blame for any typos in the RFC itself go entirely to me.
>
> *dons flame-retardant suit*
>
> --
> Larry Garfield
> larry@garfieldtech.com
I'd like to see the specific reasons for the restrictions listed in
Comparison to objects[1]. In general if something's value is even
debatable then the default position should be to remain consistent
with the rest of the language. It should take a strong argument to
introduce any artificial limitation and it's useful to have that in
the RFC.
[1] https://wiki.php.net/rfc/enumerations#comparison_to_objects