Re: Fwd: [ZEND-ENGINE-CVS] cvs: ZendEngine2 / zend_language_parser.y zend_language_scanner.l

Nah, I dread the INI word. It makes applications less portable. I prefer rolling back than doing this. Andi At 10:09 AM 7/16/2004 -0700, Sara Golemon wrote:

"Andi Gutmans" <andi@zend.com> wrote in message news:5.1.0.14.2.20040716081907.027efd68@127.0.0.1... I don't think it's critical to include this patch, but I do think it'd be a good thing. Do you really think it'll break BC for many applications? How many people have functions that use null(), false(), true()? I know people hate the dreaded "ini option" word. But how about one for this? That'd let the optimization work for the 99% of scripts that don't need to implement null(), true(), and false(), and allow those rare few to simply disable it for BC. # Note: I'm no lexx expert, this syntax may not even make sense <ST_IN_SCRIPTING>"TRUE" { if (CG(fast_constants)) {

    ZVAL_TRUE(zendlval);
    return T_TRUE;

} else {

    yymore();

} } -Sara -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php