Re: [VOTE] Straw poll: Using namespaces for *any() and *all() on iterables

Hi internals, > I've started voting > on https://wiki.php.net/rfc/any_all_on_iterable_straw_poll_namespace  > Voting starts on 2021-01-19 and ends on 2021-02-02. > > This is an 11-way Single Transferable Vote poll on the choice of namespace, > to ensure that all proposed namespaces (and similar namespaces) for global functions were > represented > after a lot of discussion. > (Votes for each ranking choice must be selected and submitted one by one because these are > independent HTML forms, > writing down your choice of ranks elsewhere before submitting may be faster) > > The choices for this poll were announced a few days ago in > https://externals.io/message/112558 "Straw poll: Naming for > *any() and *all() on > iterables", > which has some additional discussion on arguments for/against the proposed namespace choices. > > - Additional discussion on namespaces can also be found in the initial RFC announcement - > https://externals.io/message/111756 Voting on the straw poll https://wiki.php.net/rfc/any_all_on_iterable_straw_poll_namespace has closed. Of the top two options, - 12 voters had ranked PHP\iterable before the global namespace (including not listing the latter in their vote). - 11 voters had ranked the global namespace ahead of PHP\iterable (including not listing the latter in the vote). - One voter included neither in their ranked choices. See https://stv-results.theodorejb.me/php/?rfc=any_all_on_iterable_straw_poll_namespace for a simulation of the voting process with the same result (previously brought up for attributes syntax in https://externals.io/message/111630#111659) I plan to update the RFC and implementation soon, with a secondary vote with two options: PHP\iterable\any() vs PHP\iterable\any_value() Thanks, - Tyson