On Wed., Mar. 10, 2021, 11:22 Matthew Brown, <matthewmatthew@gmail.com>
wrote:
> If a significant number agree I can add a secondary vote on noreturn vs
> never, but never introduces more of a BC risk.
>
Hi Matt,
I like this RFC, but I'd like to see the RFC cover if any other languages
have a similar return type.
The definition of void is that it has no return value, so I too agree
that the keyword noreturn is too close in meaning to void.
I'd also like to throw the word deadend or something similar into the
ring, to make things a bit clearer.
Thanks,
Peter