No.
Outlook is not modern.
No.
That's not the point, the missing context is.
Sorry, could not resist ;-)
- Chris
> Am 10.05.2021 um 23:51 schrieb Kamil Tekiela <tekiela246@gmail.com>:> > Hi Internals,> > Could we drop the bottom-posting rule?> > Almost all new contributors fall into this trap and reply to a thread by> top-posting, only to get chastised by someone else on the list. It's really> difficult to remember to delete the default reply. Mail clients don't make> it easy for us; it's hidden by default. Bottom-posting makes reading the> thread much more difficult too. The actual reply gets lost in between the> quoted content. I often get confused about what is new and what was> quoted. Many modern clients are designed to handle top-posting and don't> handle bottom-posting well. People are usually used to it and they read> from top to bottom. I don't know if in the past some mail clients defaulted> to bottom-posting but right now it just seems like an unnecessary> annoyance.> > If you want to quote someone then it makes sense to copy a part of the> message and then add a reply below, but forcing people to remove the> default reply from the mail client and then add the whole previous message> on top of your own reply isn't very productive. It wastes time and screen> space.> > Could we please change this rule or at least stop enforcing it?> Do people actually have mail clients that don't automatically hide the> previous conversation? If not, then I think we can let people top-post.> > Regards,> Kamil