On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 11:02 PM Levi Morrison <levi.morrison@datadoghq.com>
wrote:
> Some of the RFC authors have been discussing this a lot based on
> feedback. In a [previous message][1] I said we would message the list
> when it's ready for re-review. It's still not ready, but we seem to be
> driving towards consensus.
>
Okay, great. I thought your previous message only referenced named
placeholders, I didn't take from that you were also considering other
discussion points. Look forward to seeing the updated RFC; personally I
think the meat of it is a good addition to the language, all the sweeter if
it's able to land for 8.1.