Re: [RFC] Add Random Extension (before: Add Random class)

From: Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2021 00:20:06 +0000
Subject: Re: [RFC] Add Random Extension (before: Add Random class)
References: 1  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-115163@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
On Fri, Jun 25, 2021, at 7:39 PM, Go Kudo wrote: > Hello Internals. > > RFC has been reorganized for finalization. > > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/rng_extension > > The changes from the previous version are as follows: > > - Changed again to a class-based approach. The argument can be omitted, in > which case an instance of XorShift128Plus will be created automatically. > - Future scope was specified in the RFC and the functionality was separated > as a Random extension. > - Changed to separate it as a Random extension and use the appropriate > namespace. > - In order to extend the versatility of the final class, Random, a > RandomInterface has been added, similar in approach to the > DateTimeInterface. > > I've done a tidy implementation to make this final, but I'm currently > suffering from error detection by Valgrind for unknown reasons. > > Implementation is here: > https://github.com/php/php-src/pull/7079 > > This can be reproduced with the following code. This looks a lot nicer! Question: Why interface RandomInterface but interface RandomNumberGenerator? I would expect either both to have an Interface suffix or neither to. (Preferably neither.) For that matter, I don't get why RandomInterface exists, if you'll just always use Random all the time, and it's final. --Larry Garfield

« previous php.internals (#115163) next »