Re: [RFC] !instanceof operator - reaction measuremen
| From: | Michał Marcin Brzuchalski | Date: | Mon, 13 Dec 2021 11:19:04 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [RFC] !instanceof operator - reaction measuremen | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-116637@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
pon., 13 gru 2021 o 12:10 Lynn <kjarli@gmail.com> napisał(a):
> Heya,
>
> While I definitely agree with this, and after more than 10 years of PHP I
> still have the tendency to write
if ($object !instanceof
> MyClass) anyway.
> Would it be possible, or would it collide with constants to do the
> following?
> ```
> $object === MyClass;
> $object !== MyClass;
> ```
> The reason I'm hoping this would be possible, is that I often have brainlag
> trying to write "instanceof" and I either make several typos, or I end up
> with "instance" and it takes me an error message to realize I forgot the
> "of". The "instanceof" is counterintuitive for me compared to operators.
>
> If this isn't possible and !instanceof would be adopted,
> what about the
> following in addition to the proposed example?
> ```
> $object implements MyInterface;
> $object !implements MyInterface;
> $object extends MyClass;
> $object !extends MyClass;
> ```
>
Why not "not" instead? The "!" in front of "i" in
"!implements" is almost
not visible which IMO could get easily ignored unintentionally.
Instead constructs like "$foo not implements stdClass" have higher
visibility and are currently a syntax error.
Cheers,
Michał Marcin Brzuchalski