Re: [VOTE] User Defined Operator Overloads
| From: | Marco Pivetta | Date: | Wed, 05 Jan 2022 02:32:25 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [VOTE] User Defined Operator Overloads | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-116807@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 3:19 AM Jordan LeDoux <jordan.ledoux@gmail.com>
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 4, 2022 at 1:27 AM Marco Pivetta <ocramius@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Can I expect this for other math related RFCs, or is this dogmatic about
> operator overload specifically? I have no clue, and at the very least, I
> would like to learn that.
>
It's in the name: "overload"
You can certainly expect pushback from my end for any implementation
thereof.
As I mentioned above, your RFC is well implemented: I oppose the feature,
not the implementation.
Greets,
Marco Pivetta
http://twitter.com/Ocramius
http://ocramius.github.com/