Re: Allowing NULL for some internal functions

From: Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2022 17:35:09 +0000
Subject: Re: Allowing NULL for some internal functions
References: 1 2 3 4  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-117164@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 5:41 PM Dik Takken <dik.takken@gmail.com> wrote: > > In my view, consistency between internal and userland functions brings a > lot of value, and not only for the language itself. As soon as internal > and userland become fully consistent it will become a lot easier to > write "internal" functions in PHP rather than C. Not only will that make > developing the standard library easier, it may also make the optimizer > and JIT compiler more effective. The more consistency the better. > Yes, and we see two possible ways to make them consistent w.r.t. handling of null argument passed into scalar parameter: 1. implicit coercion by default, error with strict_types=1 2. error (independent of strict_types) AFAIK, internal functions have been doing 1 since like forever, but PHP 7.0 chose 2 for userland functions when introducing scalar parameter type declarations (see my previous message for history) and PHP 8.1 continued in that direction by deprecating 1 for internal functions (and planning to change them to 2 in PHP 9.0). Call me devil's advocate, but is it too late to discuss revisiting past decisions and consider changing direction towards 1 for userland functions (esp. in implications of BC impact)? Regards, -- Guilliam Xavier

« previous php.internals (#117164) next »