Re: [RFC] [Under Discussion] Random Extension 5.x
| From: | Tim Düsterhus | Date: | Wed, 09 Mar 2022 18:24:13 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [RFC] [Under Discussion] Random Extension 5.x | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-117297@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Hi Larry,
On 3/9/22 19:06, Larry Garfield wrote:
* If no engine is provided to the randomizer, what gets used? If the default is listed somewhere in the RFC, I missed it. I'm assuming there should be one, for usability, but changing it in the future would be an RFC-level change (much like changing the defaults for password_hash()).I couldn't find it in the text either, but it defaults to Random\Engine\Secure as per my suggestion in the previous discussion thread for version 4 of the RFC: https://externals.io/message/117026#117027 Best regards Tim Düsterhus