Re: [RFC] [VOTE] Sealed Classes

Hi Nocolas, czw., 17 mar 2022 o 11:38 Nicolas Grekas <nicolas.grekas+php@gmail.com> napisał(a): > Le jeu. 17 mars 2022 à 04:54, Saif Eddin Gmati <azjezz@protonmail.com> a > écrit : > > > Hello Internals, > > > > As per my last email in the previous thread, i have started the vote for > > sealed classes feature. > > > > The vote will run for 2 weeks until March 31st 2022. > > > > Discussion: https://externals.io/message/117173 > > > > Draft Discussion: https://externals.io/message/114116 > > > > RFC: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/sealed_classes > > > > Hello Saif, > > Thanks for the RFC. > > I voted "no" because to me this closes extensibility in a hard way. If > users are fine ignoring an "@internal" annotation, or using reflection to > access private symbols, then I think that's fine: their problem; they know > why they need to do so - not authors. Allowing authors to forcibly remove > that capability from users is going too deep into removing power from > users. > > Said another way, I don't think this solves any problem that authors face > in practice. As such I don't think this is worth the added language > complexity + removal of power. > I'd say this is a very weak argument, we do the same with the final on class, method, property level already. But well, it's your vote. Cheers, Michał Marcin Brzuchalski