Re: GOTO operator

At 09:24 PM 7/30/2004 -0700, Sara Golemon wrote:

c) I don't think you are creating the necessary switch_free's and

other

frees when jumping out of a scope unexpectedly.

Entirely possible. The tests I've run don't complain but that doesn't

mean

something bad isn't happening.

Thanks for the pointers, I at least see what I need to be exploring now (though I havn't sat down to unfold its meaning yet). Cetainly the implementation given earlier needs work whether its to make it work as advertised or in the more limited fashion suggested in other posts. I intend to put some work into it regardless of whether it'll be included or not. As I mentioned originally, this entire effort was meant as a learning exercise, and it's doing that job. If it's used: great. If not, it'll just stay where it is and those who want it can still patch it in.

Sara, Feel free to email me personally and I can help you out and give you advice on what you should be looking at. Andi