Re: [Vote] More Appropriate Date/Time Exceptions
| From: | Theodore Brown | Date: | Fri, 16 Dec 2022 21:34:16 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [Vote] More Appropriate Date/Time Exceptions | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-119180@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 8:27 AM Derick Rethans <derick@php.net> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've just opened the vote for "More Appropriate Date/Time Exceptions".
> It runs until December 31st, 24:00 UTC.
>
> You can vote at:
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/datetime-exceptions#voting
Hi Derick,
Thank you for your work on this. I like the idea of having more specific
exceptions to avoid having to parse generic exception/warning strings.
However, I voted No because there doesn't seem to be an implementation
currently, and I'm concerned about introducing differences in error
handling between the procedural and object-oriented date functions.
Is there a rational for why the procedural date functions should continue
producing generic warnings/exceptions, rather than consistently using the
same exception hierarchy as the OO interface? I fear this could make it
harder for users to switch between the procedural and OO APIs, as some
errors might have to be handled in a different way.
Also, could maintaining parity between the procedural/OO APIs be more
difficult if they each implement error handling differently?
Perhaps I'm mistaken, but I thought that currently the procedural date
functions are simple aliases of the corresponding object method.
Best regards,
Theodore