Re: Re: [RFC][Vote] Asymmetric Visibility

> > > The vote has now closed. > > The final result is 14 Yes, 12 No, which is less than the required 66%. > The RFC is declined. > Highly interesting to see that there's a theoretical path with a different syntax that takes 4 voters to yes and change the outcome to 18/26, which would have been an approved RFC. Working with readonly nowadays I can kinda see how a-viz would be nice, but if I had a vote I'm also in the camp that didn't like the syntax. >