Re: [RFC] [Vote] Readonly amendments

On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 2:55 AM Máté Kocsis <kocsismate90@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Everyone, > > We've just opened the vote for the "Readonly amendments" RFC, which is > going to be open for 2 weeks (until 2023-02-07). > > Link: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/readonly_amendments > Discussion: https://externals.io/message/119007 > I missed something when reviewing previously. Under the Proposal 1 section is the following verbiage: > readonly classes can declare neither static, nor untyped properties, no matter if the declaration is done directly in the class or indirectly via a trait (https://github.com/php/php-src/issues/9285). Under this RFC, their non-readonly child classes would support them as any other child class does.. However, the example demonstrates neither static nor untyped properties. As such, it's hard to understand what pattern you are trying to enable here. Could you provide an example of a child class that uses static and/or untyped properties, please? Basically trying to understand what this would enable, and why. -- Matthew Weier O'Phinney mweierophinney@gmail.com https://mwop.net/ he/him