Re: RFC Idea - json_validate() validate schema
| From: | Larry Garfield | Date: | Wed, 01 Mar 2023 17:04:27 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: RFC Idea - json_validate() validate schema | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-119644@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Wed, Mar 1, 2023, at 6:06 AM, Jakub Zelenka wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 1, 2023 at 11:44 AM juan carlos morales <
> dev.juan.morales@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello Internals.
>>
>> I am thinking about improving the json_validate() function developed
>> for php 8.3.
>>
>> The actual descriptions goes like this:
>>
>> json_validate(string $json, int $depth = 512, int $flags = 0): bool
>>
>> I am thinking about enhancing this function to also be able to
>> validate against a JSON SCHEMA, giving us something like this:
>>
>> json_validate(string $json, int $depth = 512, int $flags = 0, string
>> $json_schema = null): bool
>>
>> so, if the string is a valid JSON and also respects the schema ... then
>> TRUE.
>>
>> What do you think ?
>>
>>
> I'm actually working on this. Currently developing the schema parsing in
> pure C implementation in my play C tool called jso. You can see progress
> here: https://github.com/bukka/jso/commits/next . The plan is
> to develop it
> inside jso and then port it to jsond and then propose it for json ext
> inclusion (that's how I developed the current parser). There is a lot of to
> do as JsonSchema is quite complex (composition, JSON pointers, stream
> integration for external pointers and more tricky bits) so this won't
> likely be ready for 8.3 but should be ready for 8.4. I plan to introduce
> some smaller things for 8.3 like better error reporting (error location
> which I have already working in jso) and some other small additions. By the
> way, the schema support won't be useful just for validation but also for
> decoding and possibly encoding (sort of replacement for JsonSerializable).
> Especially for decoding it can be further extended to allow class mapping.
> We could also provide automatic generation of schema from class and support
> attributes. I plan to propose all of this later as well but that might take
> some time.
>
> Regards
>
> Jakub
Ooo... This would be super userful, especially for some of the ideas I have floating about in the
back of my head for new libraries. :-) I'm no help on the C implementation side but I'd
be happy to collaborate on the user-space API design. That's something we'd want to get
very-right the first time out, or else have just the primitives that allow us to do the not-slow
bits in user-space. (Which will likely mean something more than just tacking an extra parameter
onto json_validate().)
--Larry Garfield