Re: [RFC] [Discussion] Add new function `array_group`

From: Date: Tue, 30 May 2023 16:25:21 +0000
Subject: Re: [RFC] [Discussion] Add new function `array_group`
References: 1 2 3 4  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-120463@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Here we go, https://3v4l.org/KsL3o function array_group(array $arr1, callable $compare): array { $groups = []; $group = []; $prev = NULL; foreach ($arr1 as $value) { if ($group && !$compare($prev, $value)) { $groups[] = $group; $group = []; } $group[] = $value; $prev = $value; } if ($group) { $groups[] = $group; } return $groups; } On Tue, 30 May 2023 at 18:21, Andreas Hennings <andreas@dqxtech.net> wrote: > > Thank you, this clarifies and it confirms my initial assumption of > what you are proposing. > So you want to slice an array by comparing adjacent values. > > > My personal feedback: > I think the need for the grouping behavior you describe is not common > enough that it needs its own native function. > I would say the more common desired behavior is the one in your first > example. And even for that we don't have a native function. > > Your behavior can be implemented in userland like so: > https://3v4l.org/epvHm > > > $arr1 = array(1,2,2,3,1,2,0,4,5,2); > > $groups = []; > $group = []; > $prev = NULL; > foreach ($arr1 as $value) { > if ($group && $prev > $value) { > $groups[] = $group; > $group = []; > } > $group[] = $value; > $prev = $value; > } > if ($group) { > $groups[] = $group; > } > > print_r($groups); > > > If needed, the comparison function can be separated out and passed as > a parameter. > So the array_group() function with a comparison callback parameter can > be implemented in userland. > > I think you need to make a case as to why the behavior you describe > justifies a native function. > E.g. if you find a lot of public php code that does this kind of grouping. > > I personally suspect it is not that common. > > Cheers > Andreas > > > On Tue, 30 May 2023 at 17:08, Boro Sitnikovski <buritomath@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hey, > > > > Thanks for the suggestion. > > > > For the previous case in the code, I added these in a Gist to not clutter here too much: > > > > 1. The first example corresponds to %Y¥ØªI\Fóž“ > > Vhttps://gist.github.com/bor0/b5f449bfe85440d96abd933b9f03b310#file-test_manual_group-php > > 2. The second example corresponds to > > https://gist.github.com/bor0/b5f449bfe85440d96abd933b9f03b310#file-test_array_group-php > > 3. Another example, addressing the problem of increasing subsequences is very simple with > > array_group: > > https://gist.github.com/bor0/b5f449bfe85440d96abd933b9f03b310#file-test_array_incr_subseqs-php > > > > Best, > > > > Boro > > > > > On 30.5.2023, at 16:57, Andreas Hennings <andreas@dqxtech.net> wrote: > > > > > > Hello Boro, > > > I think you should include the "expected result" in your code examples. > > > Maybe this is in your patch file, but I don't think we want to look at > > > that for discussion. > > > > > > Cheers > > > Andreas > > > > > > On Tue, 30 May 2023 at 13:35, Boro Sitnikovski <buritomath@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> > > >> Hello all, > > >> > > >> As per the How To Create an RFC instructions, I am sending this e-mail in order > > >> to get your feedback on my proposal. > > >> > > >> I propose introducing a function to PHP core named > > >> array_group. This function takes an array and a function and returns > > >> an array that contains arrays - groups of consecutive elements. This is very similar to > > >> Haskell's groupBy function. > > >> > > >> For some background as to why - usually, when people want to do grouping in PHP, > > >> they use hash maps, so something like: > > >> > > >> ``` > > >> <?php > > >> $array = [ > > >> [ 'id' => 1, 'value' => 'foo' ], > > >> [ 'id' => 1, 'value' => 'bar' ], > > >> [ 'id' => 2, 'value' => 'baz' ], > > >> ]; > > >> > > >> $groups = []; > > >> foreach ( $array as $element ) { > > >> $groups[ $element['id'] ][] = $element; > > >> } > > >> > > >> var_dump( $groups ); > > >> ``` > > >> > > >> This can now be achieved as follows (not preserving keys): > > >> > > >> ``` > > >> <?php > > >> $array = [ > > >> [ 'id' => 1, 'value' => 'foo' ], > > >> [ 'id' => 1, 'value' => 'bar' ], > > >> [ 'id' => 2, 'value' => 'baz' ], > > >> ]; > > >> > > >> $groups = array_group( $array, function( $a, $b ) { > > >> return $a['id'] == $b['id']; > > >> } ); > > >> ``` > > >> > > >> The disadvantage of the first approach is that we are only limited to using > > >> equality check, and we cannot group by, say, < or other > > >> functions. > > >> Similarly, the advantage of the first approach is that the keys are preserved, > > >> and elements needn't be consecutive. > > >> > > >> In any case, I think a utility function such as > > >> array_group will be widely useful. > > >> > > >> Please find attached a patch with a proposed implementation. Curious about your > > >> feedback. > > >> > > >> Best, > > >> > > >> Boro Sitnikovski > > >> > >

« previous php.internals (#120463) next »