Re: [VOTE] Interface Default Methods

> On Jul 2, 2023, at 21:43, Levi Morrison <morrison.levi@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sun, Jul 2, 2023 at 7:08 PM Ben Ramsey <ben@benramsey.com> wrote: >> >> I’m probably going to vote “yes” on this, but since the property accessors RFC >> won’t be ready for 8.3,[1] and that RFC covers use of properties in interfaces, how useful will >> interface default methods be without interface properties? > > Plenty useful, I think. Interfaces deal with abstractions, so there > are often things you can do without having state. Java's interfaces > don't allow properties, for instance, and they still have this > feature. > > As an example, this poor-man Sequence interface works, because the > behavior and state for next is provided by the implementer: > Thanks for the response. This makes perfect sense to me now. Cheers, Ben

Attachment: [application/pgp-signature] Message signed with OpenPGP signature.asc