Re: [RFC][Draft] Match block

On 10 September 2023 15:35:44 BST, Deleu <deleugyn@gmail.com> wrote: > ... until we manage to gather enough >voters to overcome the "no-auto-capture" camp. I think that's a rather adversarial / political way to put it. I believe the aim of voting should be to measure consensus, not replace it. A more productive wording would be "until we can find a version of the feature that satisfies the concerns raised in previous discussions". I think there are some really powerful things that could be done with new types of block, and new ways of scoping variables, but have concerns about how to fit them with the existing language. I will continue to engage in good faith in discussing those proposals, but find it disheartening to be labelled as part of a "camp" that needs to be "overcome". Regards, -- Rowan Tommins [IMSoP]