Re: Security Audit Priorities

From: Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2023 15:58:15 +0000
Subject: Re: Security Audit Priorities
References: 1 2  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-121154@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Hi On 25/09/2023 17:33, Tim Düsterhus wrote: > Hi > > On 9/25/23 10:49, Derick Rethans wrote: >> So, if you can suggest an area where doing an external review would have >> high impact, please reply to this email. > > Some things from top of my head in arbitrary order. Not all of them are necessarily important > themselves per se, but rather intended to spark additional thoughts. > > - Footguns in the default configuration / tunables / php.ini [1] This reminds me of something. There's an interesting paper about ReDoS resilience in different regex engines. Some programming languages, including PHP, are evaluated there and compared: https://www.usenix.org/system/files/sec22-turonova.pdf PHP has some configuration knobs for pcre (https://www.php.net/manual/en/pcre.configuration.php), not a lot to tune but maybe they can be? To be honest, I haven't looked much into this. > - MySQL Native Driver > - password_* [1] > - hash_equals() > - ext/json, specifically json_decode() > - The CSPRNG (ext/random/csprng.c) > - bin2hex, base64_encode [2] > - Open-ended: Misuse resistance of existing functions - Is it possible for a user to not > properly check a return value and would this result in harm (i.e. should the function throw, but > does not yet)? > > Best regards > Tim Düsterhus > > [1] These tie a little into my > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/bcrypt_cost_2023 RFC, which is not code but > configuration. > [2] Should these be made constant-time / should constant-time implementations always be > available? See: https://github.com/paragonie/constant_time_encoding > Cheers Niels

« previous php.internals (#121154) next »