Re: [VOTE][RFC] mb_ucfirst and mb_lcfirst functions
| From: | youkidearitai | Date: | Tue, 06 Feb 2024 20:19:45 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [VOTE][RFC] mb_ucfirst and mb_lcfirst functions | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-122317@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
2024年2月7日(水) 4:49 youkidearitai <youkidearitai@gmail.com>:
>
> 2024年2月7日(水) 2:56 Juliette Reinders Folmer <php-internals_nospam@adviesenzo.nl>:
> >
> > On 6-2-2024 3:40, youkidearitai wrote:
> > > 2024年2月6日(火) 8:33 Tim Starling <tstarling@wikimedia.org>:
> > >> On 2/2/24 20:27, youkidearitai wrote:
> > >>
> > >> I see. I'll change mb_ucfirst using titlecase.
> > >>
> > >> Per my comments a month ago on the GitHub issue , I think it is much better to
> > >> use title case for mb_ucfirst() than to use upper case, since conversion of the first character to
> > >> upper case has the effect of corrupting text in the Georgian script, and initial lower-case
> > >> ligatures are converted to a form which appears like two upper case letters. So I'm pleased to
> > >> see this change to the PR.
> > >>
> > >> I would appreciate it if the RFC could also be updated to include this detail,
> > >> since my vote depends on whether title case or upper case will be used.
> > >>
> > >> -- Tim Starling
> > > Hi, Tim
> > >
> > > Thank you for your comment.
> > > I modified to "uses unicode case title" in an RFC.
> > >
> > > Regards
> > > Yuya
> > >
> >
> > Help me out here, but doesn't changing what is actually proposed in an
> > RFC **after** the vote has started invalidate the vote ?
> >
> > Shouldn't the vote be closed/withdrawn and restarted in that case ?
>
> Hi, Internals.
>
> Juliette, Thank you for pointing.
> I'm mistake.
>
> I checked the following and it was exactly as I said.
> https://wiki.php.net/RFC/voting#voting
>
> > A valid voting period must be declared when voting is started and must not be changed
> > during the vote.
>
> I broke this rule. In this case, should I return to "Under discussion"?
> I apologize to those who voted, admitting lack of discussion, I want
> to reorganize.
>
> Regards
> Yuya
Hi, Internals.
This an RFC is revert to "Under Discussion".
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/howto
Referenced Section 7.3:
> A serious issue with your RFC needs to be addressed: update the status of your RFC page and its
> section on https://wiki.php.net/RFC to “Under Discussion” and
> continue again from step 5.
I would like to wait another two weeks to vote again.
Scheduled for February 21st, GMT 00:00 restart voting.
Please feel free to comment.
I apologize to everyone who voted again.
Regards
Yuya
--
---------------------------
Yuya Hamada (tekimen)
- https://tekitoh-memdhoi.info
- https://github.com/youkidearitai
-----------------------------