Re: [RFC] OOP API for cURL extension

From: Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2024 16:09:32 +0000
Subject: Re: [RFC] OOP API for cURL extension
References: 1 2  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-122397@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
On 15 February 2024 15:44:13 GMT, Sara Golemon <pollita@php.net> wrote: >* CurlHandle::exec() mixed typing of return values. > Comment: Agreed. The true return value becomes meaningless in > the >RETURNTRANSFER==false case. > Proposal: Update the RFC for CurlHandle::execute() to return ?string. Should we take this a step further, and remove CURLOPT_RETURNTRANSFER as a valid option on the object completely? Instead of an overloaded exec() method, provide: public function executeAndReturn(): string public function executeAndOutput(): void Perhaps the option could be accepted in the relevant setOpt methods, but issue a warning that it has no effect. Since both the default for the option and the name of the method are changing anyway, I don't think this significantly affects the migration effort for the tiny minority of cases where you actually want the direct output behaviour. Regards, -- Rowan Tommins [IMSoP]

« previous php.internals (#122397) next »