Re: int|float for sleep? sleep(0.1) => sleep 0.1 seconds

From: Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2024 08:12:21 +0000
Subject: Re: int|float for sleep? sleep(0.1) => sleep 0.1 seconds
References: 1 2 3 4 5 6  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-122582@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
On Tue, 5 Mar 2024 at 20:17, Larry Garfield <larry@garfieldtech.com> wrote: > > A 3 way up-down vote doesn't make sense. What happens if none of the 3 options reaches > 66%? > > The viable options here are a single RCV vote (which we've done before), or a single > "Should we do this" vote that requires 66%, followed by a "when should we do > this" vote with 2 options, majority wins. > > --Larry Garfield Does this work for you guys? ===== Proposed Voting Choices ===== ### 1. Enhancement of Precision: Float Arguments for Sub-Second Precision **Should we extend sleep() to accept floats for sub-second delays?** - Yes - No **Which PHP version should implement this feature if accepted?** - 8.4 - 9.0 ### 2. Normalized Return Values on Windows **Should we modify sleep() on Windows for consistent return values?** - Yes - No **Which PHP version should implement this feature if accepted?** - 8.4 - 9.0 ### 3. Enhanced Return Value Precision **Should we increase sleep() return value precision to include fractions of a second?** - Yes - No **Which PHP version should implement this feature if accepted?** - 8.4 - 9.0 @Tim >adding a short *nix explanation of when sleep will return earlier than expected would be helpful Where should that be? in the "Introduction" section? or the "Proposal" section? (or elsewhere?)

« previous php.internals (#122582) next »