Re: RFC [Discussion]: array_find

Hi On 4/10/24 00:12, Larry Garfield wrote:

I feel the same. Adding an enum for each binary parameter that is semantically true and false feels quite unwieldy with how class / enums / interfaces are currently organized in the namespace hierarchy.

Point of order: This parameter is *not* semantically true and false. It is semantically either/or, and we kinda twist sideways to make it look like true/false if we squint. That's actually pretty common in the current stdlib, though it's not a good approach. Hence why I asked about an enum. I wouldn't expect it to be single-function, though, but to be applicable for multiple functions. (I did not go looking to see if such functions exist.)

Whoops, I accidentally a word in that paragraph, thank you. It should have read "each binary parameter that is NOT semantically true and false". Best regards Tim Düsterhus