Re: Overriding GMP objects

On Thu, Jun 27, 2024 at 2:35 PM Rob Landers <rob@bottled.codes> wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 27, 2024, at 06:07, Saki Takamachi wrote: > > > I agree with Gina. Being able to change the class of a computed result of > an inherited child class causes several problems. > > The points raised in the BCMath\Number discussion can be > summarized as > follows. > > - If it is possible to perform calculations on parent Class and child > Class, what should the resulting class be? > > > Ask the class what it wants to be? > > - Multiplying the distance class and the speed class should give you the > time class. > > > That would depend on the library’s implementation. > > - Similarly, multiplying two distance classes together should yield an > area class. > > > See above. > > - If only child classes have a property that should be specified in the > constructor, how do you determine the value of this property in the result > class? Perhaps it is possible to determine the value of the property, but > in that case the commutativity of the computation should be lost. > > > This can be handled via the child class in static methods, per the library > specifications. > How is the library supposed to do that in the absence of operator handler functions that can be overridden, or at least called when an operator is encountered? Jordan