Re: [RFC] Operator Overrides -- Lite Edition
| From: | Rob Landers | Date: | Sat, 29 Jun 2024 17:56:43 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [RFC] Operator Overrides -- Lite Edition | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-124056@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Sat, Jun 29, 2024, at 17:37, Ben Ramsey wrote:
> > On Jun 29, 2024, at 10:16, Larry Garfield <larry@garfieldtech.com> wrote:
> >
> > For clarity (since I know from experience it's helpful to RFC authors to have a
> > concrete sense of votes in advance): I will be voting No on this RFC. As both Jordan and Saki have
> > explained, it's a hideous hack that doesn't look like it would even work, much less be
> > wise. I'd much rather take a second swing at Jordan's original operator overloading RFC,
> > which I supported and still support. Let's do it right.
>
>
> I agree with Larry that I would rather take another look at an overall operator overloading RFC
> than to implement this in one specific extension.
>
> Cheers,
> Ben
>
Thank you Larry and Ben, I appreciate it. Out of curiosity, do you consider ArrayAccess and
Stringable a hideous hack too?
— Rob