Re: Re: [PHP-DEV] Learning from Python: PEPping the PHP Development Process
| From: | Wez Furlong | Date: | Sat, 28 Aug 2004 18:44:53 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: [PHP-DEV] Learning from Python: PEPping the PHP Development Process | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-12451@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
IMO, it makes sense to fold EXPERIMENTAL and CREDITS files into the
package.xml files that Hartmut added; they provide versioning and
status information.
Non-BC API changes require a bump to the API major number; a new major
in alpha or beta implies that the new API is subject to change until
it is marked stable.
--Wez.
On Fri, 27 Aug 2004 10:26:25 +0300, Zeev Suraski <zeev@zend.com> wrote:
> I would like to get some feedback about my suggestion to move away from the
> simple 'experimental' status and dividing it into two - quality rating, and
> 'API subject to change' tagging. Does this make sense to anybody else?