Re: Time-out Posting to PHP Internals List
| From: | Christoph M. Becker | Date: | Fri, 16 Aug 2024 22:50:14 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Time-out Posting to PHP Internals List | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-125006@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On 17.08.2024 at 00:36, Rob Landers wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 16, 2024, at 22:16, Kris Craig wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Aug 16, 2024 at 8:11 AM Derick Rethans <derick@php.net> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> In the last months, you have had numerous suggestions to keep it civil
>>> on the mailing list, in the "C++ Enhancements" thread [1,2,3,4,5,6], and
>>> multiple other threads [7,8,9], and by many individuals. Despite that,
>>> you did continue with ad hominems and related belligerent language,
>>> bordering on trolling.
>>>
>>> You have therefore been given a 3-month timeout, which will be enforced
>>> by blocking you from sending email to the php.net domain, including
>>> subdomains.
>>>
>>> Evading, or attempts to evade, this restriction will result in longer
>>> expulsions.
>>>
>>> with kind regards,
>>> Derick Rethans
>>>
>>> [1] https://externals.io/message/124879#124905
>>> [2] https://externals.io/message/124879#124931
>>> [3] https://externals.io/message/124879#124936
>>> [4] https://externals.io/message/124879#124948
>>> [5] https://externals.io/message/124879#124950
>>> [6] https://externals.io/message/124879#124951
>>> [7] https://externals.io/message/123573#123605
>>> [8] https://externals.io/message/124139#124168
>>> [9] https://externals.io/message/123769#123888
>>
>> This message kinda freaked me out until I realized it wasn't directed at me lol.
>> Couldn't this have just been sent to the individual privately instead? I really don't
>> need to see a notification whenever somebody gets themselves temp-banned from the list, just saying.
>
> I saw the first few lines on my phone and had a similar wtaf reaction. Adding the person’s
> name in the salutation would help instead of a general “hello”. But otherwise, I think it is
> healthy for it to be public. Voices silently silenced, even for a good reason, are never a good
> thing. Also, it gives people a chance to advocate for the banned or object to the banning, if they
> so choose.
Spot on!
Christoph